Taken 3 (2014) – Liam Neeson and Forest Whitaker

If you think Taken 2 was being unorthodox by having Liam Neeson‘s hotshot character Bryan Mills among those kidnapped, you’ll probably think Taken 3’s a bit out there too, since it sees his wife killed in the first 20 minutes and Bryan becomes the prime suspect but doesn’t stick around to get arrested even in his own country, in his own house – instead he decides to go on the run and get to the bottom of things in his own way.

This movie benefits massively from the presence of Forest Whitaker who plays the lead investigator on the case of Bryan’s ex wife’s murder – you may recogise him as an FBI agent from Bloodsport several decades ago. He’s a pretty good actor, on a similar level to Neeson I’d say, even if nowhere near as rich or famous, he has just as much screen charisma.

Inline with what we’ve come to expect from the first two Taken movies, this one continues the theme of realistic insights into tactics that such a person as Neeson’s character Bryan would be likely to use, including some things more cliché and other things that we’d be less likely to consider. Such as inconspicuous code words over telephone calls (cliché but tactically powerful), and escaping from a foot chase by going through unexpected underground tunnel systems that have inconspicuous entrance masking objects (kind of like hiding in plain sight, thus still a bit cliché, while equally powerful). Also escaping from handcuffs using a concealed pick – something like what I thought we would see in the last movie to be honest, and then he pulled out a mini mobile phone instead! He also does a bit of waterboarding – a torture & interrogation technique made popular by American military in Gitmo etc.

As with the last movie, the hand-to-hand combat scenes here are very choppy between different camera angles – a classic method of masking an actor’s lack of real combative acumen, and in this case, his total lack of physical coordination altogether.

This movie also has a vibe of mystery that wasn’t present in the first two Taken movies, such that it’s not until half an hour before the end that we ever find out who killed Bryan’s ex wife – or so we think – and it’s not until the last quarter an hour that someone (his daughter) actually gets “Taken” this time round.

Even though this movie deviates from the standard Taken concept, and takes a while to warm up, and is a bit miserable early on; in the end I have to rate it higher than Taken 2, and roughly on a par with the original thanks to its strong ending. The highest point was near the end, when Bryan was speeding in a Porsche, chasing after the plane that his ex wife’s murderer turned daughter’s kidnapper was trying to escape in. But it wasn’t just an isolated high, it was part of a larger ending that’s generally quite strong thanks to the converging contributions of multiple decent actors and the richness & pace of the script – something gravely lacking earlier on.

I was disappointed (but not surprised) by the closing scene though. When, after learning that his daughter is pregnant, Bryan says something along the lines of “whatever you decide, I’ll support you” as if there’s a decision to be made (to kill or not to kill, is what I assume it means). But they cleverly brushed that one under the carpet quickly, by talking about the potential name of the baby, as if that’s what Bryan were referring to all along.

High Rollers (2025) – John Travolta

This is a bit of a fun action movie, starring a 70-year-old John Travolta, with slight vibes of Mission Impossible. Although it gets off to a slow start, and gets a bit nasty in places, and is generally quite a simple movie, and has a long monotonous action scene towards the end; once it gets going it sustains an upbeat vibe and remains mildly captivating pretty much until the end scenes, which is rare for a movie so plain & simple as this one – especially one with a bit of a B-movie vibe about it. It’s actually quite an achievement and earns this movie a rating of slightly Below Average which makes it not much weaker than a lot of classics, which is quite an achievement considering some parts have a slight whiff of B-movie acting & cinematography, which is especially obvious towards the end, but does not make the movie a complete write-off – even the ending is slightly captivating, and the very ending is alright. It’s even tempting to rank this movie Bang Average on a par with many classics, but we have to consider its rewatchability which considering the minimal plot, simple script and intermittently weak acting & cinematography would make it quite hard to rewatch until it’s been pretty much totally forgotten again.

Travolta’s age is telling here – not so much in his face, but in the way he moves like a stiff & fragile stumbling old man.

Purely based on appearance, one of the supporting cast members called Caras, played by a guy who calls himself Swen Temmel, is almost certainly a real life son of John Travolta. Add to this how he looks nothing like his official father, but looks so much like Travolta he’s even been pictured doing impressions of him and the resemblance is striking.

The main woman on the protagonists’ team is a hacker called Link, played by Natali Yura, who is like a pound shop (or dollar store) Scarlett Johannson. Not as smart, classy or attractive but a similar flavour nevertheless.

Demián Castro does a solid job in playing Zade Black – the “target” and brother of the main antagonist. And the main antagonist – a man called Salazar, who has coerced the team of protagonists into helping him – is played quite adequately by Danny Pardo, although he doesn’t make as strong an impression and doesn’t get so much screen time as Castro.

All in all, I’d say this is a Netflix-grade movie, that’s blessed with a single elderly A-List star, and seems to have heavily supplemented its team of old-school industry dogsbodies with green new blood, such that it sits somewhere between Respectably Average and Hard To Watch.

Captain America: The Winter Soldier (2014) – Chris Evans

No amount of loud music during simplistic high kicking, or non-martial gymnastic tumbling by stuntmen, is going to make Captain America any less dead dry in character or any more cool in superpowers. But they seemed to think it might, with all that kind of noise in the first 15 minutes. Then again later on.

Sure, there’s some decent action bits here, and I mean fractions of bits, from time to time, but that’s literally the limit of this movie’s coolness. Having said that, it’s still mostly easy viewing, while they try to work through an attention-worthy script. So I can’t give it less than a Bang Average rating, but I can’t rate it any higher either. It’s about equal to Chris Pratt’s Guardians Of The Galaxy as well as Chris Pine’s Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit – both also from 2014. It’s also about equal to the original Captain America: The First Avenger from 2011.

Chris Evans stars in this movie, as Captain America himself, and while he’s a bit of a boring superhero, he seems like a pleasant guy which makes for easy viewing that’s neither very awesome nor very distressing.

Further cast members include Scarlett Johansson who plays Agent Natasha Romanoff (aka Black Widow). She’s not bad, but she looks like a Ghost in the Shell of her former self (pardon the pun). At first I really thought she were someone else brought in to be a poundshop or dollarstore version of Scarlett Johansson, then I realised it’s actually her. Maybe it’s the hair style, or the outfits, or she gained weight, or all of the above, but something’s definitely off. She seems drained of energy here. A Stark contrast to when she appeared in Iron Man 2 (pardon the pun). It’s like she aged heavily in those four years.

There’s also Anthony Mackie playing Sam Wilson – he’s probably been casted mainly to represent the ethnic audience and to replicate the chemistry Robert Downey Jr had with Don Cheadle in Iron Man. With vibes of Jamie Fox crossed with Snoop Dogg, he does a fair job.

Frank Grillo also adds value to this movie, as one of the swat-type guys in the SHIELD strike team. He’s got a bit of character to him, and holds down the role of a tactical team member quite well. He’s a familiar face since he’s worked his way into a lot of cheap action hero movies in recent years.

Samuel L Jackson, as Director of SHIELD, does a decent job in raising the standard of the slower scenes from what would probably otherwise be quite boring, into something that’s ultimately quite watchable. He also does a great job of adding value to the occasional high-octane action scene he’s involved in, such as the car chase that results in him being kidnapped. Very rarely does a car chase scene so long drawn out as that one manage to sustain attention so well as that one did.

Shortly after 30 minutes in, after the car chase, this movie becomes increasingly interesting as Samuel L Jackson’s character is waiting in Cap’s apartment, hiding out, telling him silently that SHIELD is compromised, then gets shot by a sniper who Cap pursues only to discover he’s just as physically gifted as himself. That sniper is the main antagonist for much of the movie, played adequately by Sebastian Stan mostly from behind a mask.

By contrast, the last half hour is pretty weak. It’s a fairly non descript one-dimensional long-winded drama-oriented dull-action-based ending, so while at times this movie gets exciting, overall I can’t rank it any better than Bang Average, as mentioned earlier – on a par with the original Captain America: The First Avenger.

Further sequels

If you’re following the Marvel movies in order, next up is Guardians Of The Galaxy (2014) which has an original set of characters, followed by Avengers: Age Of Ultron (2015) where Captain America returns alongside Iron Man, Thor, The Hulk and Black Widow just like in the last Avengers movie. Then we get Ant-Man to round off MCU Phase 2, then Phase 3 kick-starts in 2016 with a third movie dedicated to Captain America, called Captain America: Civil War. Several Marvel movies later, towards the end of Phase 5, we get the fourth Captain America movie called Captain America: Brave New World (2025) no longer starring Chris Evans who says he is happily retired from the role already.

Universal Soldier: The Return (1999) – Van Damme, Goldberg and Michael Jai White

This movie offers a novel twist on the already creative concept established in the original, while also featuring strong new co-stars in Bill Goldberg and Michael Jai White. This is actually the fourth movie in the Universal Soldier franchise, but the second & third did not feature Jean-Claude Van Damme or anyone else of note (the main protagonist in both was Matt Battaglia) so you’ll be forgiven for watching the first movie then jumping straight to this one – the fourth.

We don’t see enough of wrestling superstar Goldberg in this kind fast action movie – he makes a very convincing tough guy. Plus, this is easily one of Michael Jai White’s better performances – the robotic superiority-complex role matches his real life demeanour.

Overall I rate this a Decent movie – it’s a bit less of a revelation than the original but still quite creative with a fresh new concept, and features multiple action superstars, but on the downside the plot is a bit one dimensional – the script could have easily been developed more to make it an even better movie. There are multiple females in this movie, including a reporter and a fellow UNISOL, but none of them are particularly worth mentioning – they all deliver bland performances.

Fun fact: this was actually Van Damme’s last widely-released-in-cinemas English-language movie until 2 and a half decades later, when he released Darkness Of Man in 2024 (excluding movies where he wasn’t the main star, such as The Expendables 2 in 2012). Maybe he wasn’t totally playing ball with Hollywood’s sickest shenanigans, but they eventually rewarded him for keeping quiet during the deceptions of the 2020 era? Or maybe his movies had only a small niche audience? The fact that Inferno (1999) had only a limited cinematic released is odd, and the fact that The Order (2001) went direct to video is outrageous.

Further Sequels

If you enjoyed the original Universal Soldier movie from 1992, as well as this one – Universal Soldier: The Return – from 1999, which is the second one starring Van Damme; then you’ll be pleased to know there are a couple more decent Universal Soldier movies to enjoy after this one.

Universal Soldier: Regeneration (2009) rekindles the rivalry between Van Damme and Dolph Lundgren, then they both come back again for Universal Soldier: Day of Reckoning (2012) with the addition of Scott Adkins as the main protagonist in the final movie. Both of these movies from 2009 & 2012 also make a significant role for Andrei Arlovski, the former UFC heavyweight champion who still holds the record for the most wins in UFC heavyweight history to this day.

One More Shot (2024) – Scott Adkins and Michael Jai White

This movie started out looking like a B movie, considering its sound effects, camerawork and acting standards. But it soon caught fire and sustained my attention and entertained me once Scott Adkins appeared about 10 minutes in.

Well done to whoever managed to put this semi-respectable movie together on what seems like a humble budget, outside of the resources of Hollywood et al. To its credit, the action and equipment used, seems to make great use of low budget money. The camerawork and sound effects were also on point intermittently throughout this movie, for example, at nearly 45 minutes in when Scott silently takes a man out by sneaking up and jamming a knife in his neck, that was really slick choreography backed by strong cinematography to the point it’s not noticeably any worse than top Hollywood standards for a moment there. So it’s not a bad effort and not a bad result overall, considering what we’re working with here.

Make no mistake, I am not one of those guys who enjoys watching the occasional B-movie. I can’t stand them, but this movie kind of works, so I guess it can’t be a B-movie really, especially since it’s starring Scott Adkins and has some decent settings & props – it’s more like a BBC drama episode mixed up with a Hollywood action superstar or two. It’s like something made for Netflix, with cost cuts all over the place. Less grandiose visuals and sound effects; more irritating suspenseful noise effects and godawful Eastenders-style acting throughout. But it has some seriously strong action scenes. Scott Adkins basically carries this movie, and I wouldn’t be surprised if it were literally made for him, maybe even funded by him.

It turns out the truth is not far off. It was made by one of the UK’s leading independent production & distribution agencies (Signature Entertainment, founded by Marc Goldberg, a West Ham supporter), and its UK distribution rights were bought by Sky, while its US distribution rights were bought by a division of Sony (called Destination Films). So it’s not exactly Hollywood, but its roughly the next best level around.

It was good to see Michael Jae White join the show too, a little over half an hour in. I don’t say that very often – I’m not his biggest fan – he’s all fronting, even in real life, a bit like Steven Seagal, but with far less martial arts skill – but at least he’s another name in the cast, so it’s likely to continue being a half decent movie, with some effort towards plot development through the remaining hour of the movie. Having said that, he has put in some decent performances in some of his movies, this one included – he’s working with some very corny lines here, but delivers them like a boss. Well, near enough, for the kind of standard we can reasonably hope for here.

Alexis Knapp puts in a respectable performance as the female leader of the baddies in One More Shot. Tom Berenger does a fair job as a CIA boss who she kills, and Edward ‘Teddy’ Linard makes a convincing mercenary.

The blood-soaked crying & snivelling was overly dragged out towards the back end of this movie – we don’t need so much of that in an action hero movie. But the techniques of blackmail & torture are realistic considering what really goes on in this world – well done to the team for raising awareness of such dastardly tactics.

The ending was a bit anticlimactical, as if the real ending was chopped off and we only saw up until the scene before it. But it’s not a terrible ending either – I’ve seen plenty of otherwise decent action movies have a really poor ending and this wasn’t any worse than them. It was kind of smooth, but short and underwhelming compared to what it could have been, but realistically, considering how bad the start was, we shouldn’t be expecting a better ending than what we got.

This movie is actually a sequel to One Shot (2021) also starring Scott Adkins – be sure to check it out if you were a fan of this movie – maybe even watch that one first. Both are named after the one-shot or one-take filming method where the entire movie is either shot in one single long continuous take, or (more realistically) edited to appear as if it were shot that way, or at least with very few sharp switches between scenes. Between these two movies – One Shot and One More Shot – that’s already half of everything the British screenwriter & director James Nunn and the British producer Ben Jacques are known for. Marc Goldberg co-produced One Shot alongside his colleague Ben Jacques, then stepped down to allow Ben to take the lead in One More Shot; while James Nunn (not the actor) personally wrote and directed both movies, presumably with significant input from Scott Adkins and other highly experienced cast members.

Distribution rights to the original movie, One Shot (2021), were purchased by Screen Media Ventures, LLC (trading as Screen Media or Screen Media Films). Its parent company Chicken Soup for the Soul Entertainment, Inc went bankrupt in 2024 after declaring over half a billion dollars in losses during 2023. Oops!

All in all, I rate One More Shot as Watchable – no more, no less. I won’t level it up to “OK” because that would be setting you up for disappointment since it’s certainly not on the level of the movies that I have rated OK. But I also won’t say it’s intolerable – I genuinely watched it from start to finish and it kind of sustained my interest and was worthy of a review. I would have switched off within about 15 minutes if it were anything less, but it delivered, and to be honest, after the dead first few minutes, I had to scan ahead to make sure it gets better, then go back and continue from where I left off. The other movies I’ve rated watchable include performances from pretty much all the best action movie stars of all time – they’ve all done some stinkers in their time, so it’s nothing to be terribly ashamed of, but make no mistake, they’ve all done much better too, Scott Adkins included. That’s not to say his performance here was terrible – he actually did quite well, considering what he was working with. He was his usual self, with a bit more weight on his shoulders, and a bit more baggage hanging on his coattails. Fair play. Don’t write him off as finished just yet. He deserves one more shot. Ba-dum tss!

Scott Adkins in One More Shot (2024)

Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995) – Steven Seagal

Under Siege 2: Dark Territory (1995) has a very similar story to the original Under Siege (1992) where Seagal’s character, an ex SEAL working as a chef, found himself on a military battleship that got hijacked by pirates led by a crazy ex-CIA man, except this time it’s a public train he’s on that gets hijacked by a different crazy ex-CIA man.

While some people prefer this sequel, most people agree the original was slightly better in pretty much every way, myself included – I rate this sequel as OK, just one level below the original which I rated as Decent. I feel like the original had a bit more of an atmosphere – a bit more stage setting – a bit more general production value. Still, they’re near enough alike that it’s well worth watching this sequel soon after watching the original. They follow on quite nicely from each other, since the first had a bit more of a backstory and the second gets stuck in sooner with less building or questioning.

This time, Steven Seagal‘s character Casey Ryback is on board the hijacked train with his only remaining relative, his niece (Sarah Ryback, played adequately by Katherine Heigl) – the daughter of his recently deceased brother who was also a decorated military hotshot but not quite as decorated as himself.

The main baddies in this movie are also played adequately by Eric Bogosian (the brains) and Everett McGill (the top braun). Everett McGill in this movie looks remarkably like the Tekken 3 character Brian Fury who I would be willing to bet was based on him since that game was released into arcades just under 18 months after the release of this movie. Everett also has a bit of a Clint Eastwood vibe about him, while Eric Bogosian seems to have shared hairdresser with Elliott Gould.

Under Siege (1992) – Steven Seagal

Under Siege (1992) was the fifth movie in Steven Seagal‘s career, and in most objective movie buffs’ perspective, remained his biggest and best role of all.

This movie is generally very well made. It has good timing, good acting, good budget, good sets, good sound effects, good camera work… It’s a decent movie all round. The plot is a bit simplistic and this makes the movie a bit one dimensional but it’s generally well executed and is right up there as one of the best movies in Steven’s career, if not the very best – some people prefer Under Siege 2 although most believe the first was the better one, and some people prefer Glimmer Man, but Under Siege is still right up there in everyone’s eyes as one of the best if not the very best movie he’s ever made.

Cast includes Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Busey as the main baddies – they both do a decent job, if a little unpleasant but that’s probably the fault of the director more than the actors; and Erika Eleniak plays the lead female role – not very impressively in my humble opinion but I guess she’s just doing her job and is not there to act like a trained navy seal, she’s there to play the role of a bimbo and that’s exactly how she comes across so maybe she deserves credit in a way? Fortunately she doesn’t take up too much screen time, so it’s not a big problem. Many other supporting cast members put in strong performances – too many to mention right now.

All in all, I personally rate this movie as Seagal’s joint best performance – roughly equal to The Glimmer Man – on a par with most of Van Damme’s above-average movies like Inferno and Assassination Games. Under Siege is not just an OK movie, it’s better than OK, it’s rather decent. I wouldn’t go so far as to describe it as pretty good, but it’s only one level shy of that. It’s just a couple of levels shy of Very Good. Indeed, the entertainment value of Under Siege is solid and quite consistent. Any boring bits are rare and don’t last long. It’s a fairly strong product that was quite deserving of its sequel.

In its day, this movie was easily the best so far in Steven Seagal’s career. He later went on to make one or two more on a similar level, but this is a level he never significantly topped, if ever at all.

The best moment in this movie is probably when the bad guys, having just taken over the ship and locked away all but one of its crew members, get hold of the captain’s personnel files and realise the harmless Cook running loose (played by Seagal) is actually a former Navy SEAL.

Steven Seagal in Under Siege (1992)

Sequel

If you enjoyed Under Siege (1992) you should definitely check out its sequel Under Siege 2 (1995), which has a very similar style except in the sequel Seagal is re-taking control of a train instead of a ship.

Universal Soldier (1992) – Jean-Claude Van Damme

Van Damme stars in this movie, as a soldier brought back to life as a kind of Terminator 1 style cyborg, who then gets taken and kind of “woken up” by a journalist. Dolph Lundgren plays his main adversary – another member of the same cyborg squad, tasked with bringing Van Damme’s character back in, or killing him.

This movie has a very creative base storyline, with credible lead acting, and the odd awesome scene; but it gets a bit boring towards the end as the writers run out of creativity, which makes for less interesting re-watching.

Fortunately there’s at least one decent sequel to keep you entertained if you enjoyed this movie.

The whole saga, in summary

Safe to say, every movie in the Universal Soldier saga (excluding those that did not feature Van Damme) is about a couple of levels worse than the one before it.

The original was fresh & inspired – it had the potential to be one of the best movies ever made – but it dragged its heels towards the end, with an over extended fight scene that gets boring for rewatchers.

The second movie was also quite creative with the computer taking over, and had some great new cast members (especially Goldberg). Its script was quite one dimensional but it was still a decent movie, with decent cinematography and decent entertainment value throughout.

The third movie had a slightly interesting concept and featured some interesting new cast members, but was quite poorly made. Cold and soul-less, almost like a B movie. At times it seemed like it was about to catch fire but it never really did.

Then the fourth and final movie in the series took coldness & soullessness to a whole new level. It never really seemed like it was ever going to catch fire. It was really a chore to sit through the first hour – I think I must have tried to watch it a few times but switched off early every time – I only tolerated it once for the benefit of this review, so you don’t have to!